Why would a seller continue to use photographs of items similar to merchandise they reportedly have in their possession? Why not use the originals? One cannot help but suspect the seller is simply fishing for high bids on items they know they can then purchase for less elsewhere.
Red wrote:
Why would a seller continue to use photographs of items similar to merchandise they reportedly have in their possession? Why not use the originals? One cannot help but suspect the seller is simply fishing for high bids on items they know they can then purchase for less elsewhere.
It's an Alan-53 Auction. He always lists things with pictures of different items. Wouldn't touch one of his auctions with a ten foot pole.
Jlong wrote:
Quality...
http://www.ebay.com/itm/JRR-TOLKIEN-E ... rints&hash=item257f192b98
That;s the best picture of a mutant drowning a chicken that I have ever seen. What are you complaining about?
Not *particularly* early ...
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Early-Copy- ... ks_UK&hash=item5d40428490
- wellinghall
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Early-Copy- ... ks_UK&hash=item5d40428490
- wellinghall
This one's even worse - there are pages missing, but the tape is still there!
http://www.ebay.com/itm/The-Hobbit-by ... ks_UK&hash=item58a128f67d
http://www.ebay.com/itm/The-Hobbit-by ... ks_UK&hash=item58a128f67d
125
18174