Rómenna Meeting Report - December 9, 1984
RÓMENNA MEETING REPORT
December 9, 1984
Present: | Randolph Fritz
|
| Per Hollander
|
| Carol Smith
|
| Margaret Purdy (host)
|
We began our discussion of the hobbits' journey through the Old
Forest with the quip from Randolph that the trees in the Forest were
"mean sons of beeches." That led into an inquiry on what kind of
trees actually were in the Forest. Tolkien mentions pines and firs in
the higher areas, and the oaks and alders and "nameless trees" of the
deep forest. And the willows, of course. We also wondered what had
been the model for the Old Forest, whether it was a place that Tolkien
had been himself. It didn't sound to us like an English or French
forest. The Black Forest in Germany was suggested, and Per said the
description reminded him of forests in Scandinavia, especially the
thickets of heavy undergrowth which he remembered struggling through
with difficulty. The description was good enough for Tolkien to have
been in such a forest, but we couldn't think of any evidence for
Tolkien having been to Scandinavia before he wrote
The Lord of the
Rings.
This time the hobbits do take bearings as they travel (Merry
being especially good at it), but unfortunately the forest is actively
trying to get them lost. We noted that they seem to assume that only
people make paths, never having heard of game trails. On the other
hand, we didn't see any mentions of animals in the descriptions of the
Forest. Perhaps the trees don't like animals much. It was mentioned
that in
The Adventures of Tom Bombadil, animals appear as characters
in the poems, for instance the badgers, the otter, and the kingfisher
and swan.
We wondered what Old Man willow intended to do with Merry and
Pippin once he'd captured them. We couldn't think of any specific
purpose it might have had in mind, and decided it would probably just
have kept them in there.
We now passed on to the fertile subject of Tom Bombadil. He
states that he is "Eldest," which led to the suggestion that he was
possibly the "first Maia in" when the Valar and Maiar entered Arda.
His saying that he had seen "the dark under the stars when it was
fearless, before the Dark Lord came from Outside" would seem to
suggest that he predated Morgoth, although it's not clear which Dark
Lord he's referring to. We decided that he wasn't easily
classifiable, but that he certainly
belongs.
In the
Letters, Tolkien describes Bombadil as being something
like an embodiment of "pure science," which observes without getting
involved or taking responsibility. This is why the Ring has no effect
on him; since he has no desire for power, it can't get any hold on
him. He was described as a sort of "Maia Henry David Thoreau."
Mention was made of Celtic deities; male deities tended to be
associated with a tribal group, and female ones with a piece of land.
We tried to apply this to Tom and Goldberry, but realized that Tom,
being closely associated with a particular piece of land, was more
like the female Celtic deities than the male ones! It was also
pointed out that Goldberry was associated with water (perhaps Tom is
Earth and Goldberry is Water). Tom was also compared to Pan. All in
all he is a creature of contradictions. We wondered if Tolkien had
more or less put him in at an early stage of the composition and had
forgotten either to take him out or to explain him, but we decided
that Tolkien was such a perfectionist that such carelessness was
unlikely. Later on we found the passage in the Letters that describes
Bombadil as an intentional enigma. We concluded by imagining the
meeting of Gandalf and Tom which Gandalf mentions near the end of the
book; that must have been interesting.
All of the hobbits (except Sam) have dreams in Bombadil's house,
but Frodo's are the most interesting; on the first night he dreams of
Gandalf and sees his rescue from Saruman's tower, and on the second
night he has a dream or vision of Valinor.
We went on to discuss the barrow-wights. We clarified that they
are dark spirits from elsewhere, not the spirits or ghosts of the
people buried in the barrows, who were the lords and ladies of the
kingdom that had formerly been there. We got sidetracked trying to
decide whether they had been nobles of Cardolan or Arthedain, and then
trying to decide whether the Shire was considered part of/had been
chartered from Cardolan or Arthedain. We were at least able to come
to a decision on the second matter, since the king who chartered the
Shire was Argeleb II, and the kings of Arthedain were the ones who
used the
Ar- prefix (after Cardolan and Rhudaur had fallen to the
Witch-King of Angmar). We decided that the brooch that Tom took from
the barrow had probably belonged to a Dúnadan lady that Tom had known.
We were astonished at the naiveté of the hobbits, shown by the
fact that they had never considered that they might have to fight on
their travels; the first they do consider it is when Tom gives them
each a small sword from the barrow. They had, after all, heard about
Bilbo's adventures, in which he had had to fight. Probably that all
seemed very long ago and far away, something that didn't really apply
to them. We decided that Gandalf should have given Frodo a Boy Scout
manual.
Tom guides the hobbits as far as Bree and then leaves them. We
went far enough to note that "bree" is a Celtic word for "hill" and
note the presence of other Celtic words in the Bree-land, and we also
noticed that Sam is so parochial that he doesn't know what kind of
folk live in Bree. The rest of the hobbits' sojourn there, however,
will have to wait for our next discussion.
Previous: November 11, 1984 -
Next: January 13, 1985
All contents copyright © 2007 Margaret Dean, all rights reserved