By
Red
4 Apr, 2013
2013-4-4 6:11:52 PM UTC
Not really sure of the validity of this. It seems that even the most tenuous connection to Tolkien's works receives a disproportionate amount of media hype. However, I imagine the value of the ring in question has since increased somewhat.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-22008746
4 Apr, 2013
2013-4-4 6:53:08 PM UTC
You are correct, one thing that is used over and over again, is that Tolkien needed influences and had no imagination
This is incorrect in nearly every case, but I think this may have some validity, interesting to see comments.
4 Apr, 2013
2013-4-4 9:51:07 PM UTC
4 Apr, 2013
2013-4-4 9:58:18 PM UTC
Nope; there's no evidence that Tolkien visited the site - there was no reason for him to do so; he and Wheeler communicated by letter. Tolkien was asked to write about the name Nodens; the Silchester ring was not discussed in the Wheeler report.