Mr. Underhill wrote:
Emilien wrote:
What a beauty, what a dream... even if the jacket has been restored.
If only I could win at the lottery...
It is a beautiful restoration job, but $79K is too high for a non-original wrapper...probably even for an original one. IMO
It says 'A near fine very clean copy in the ORIGINAL EXTREMELY SCARCE DUST JACKET.'
is that incorrect?
I bought a better non-restored version of the 2nd impression 18months ago - for $16k....
This price feels way too high. But then again, they've been increasing a lot.
This price feels way too high. But then again, they've been increasing a lot.
billhinge wrote:
Mr. Underhill wrote:
Emilien wrote:
What a beauty, what a dream... even if the jacket has been restored.
If only I could win at the lottery...
It is a beautiful restoration job, but $79K is too high for a non-original wrapper...probably even for an original one. IMO
It says 'A near fine very clean copy in the ORIGINAL EXTREMELY SCARCE DUST JACKET.'
is that incorrect?
It's semantics, technically it is the original wrapper, it's just had some restoration done to it. Just like a restoration done to a painting, still the original painting with work done on it.
lol, even a 1978 4th/1 with rubbed out writing is on sale at £225 (I bought the £40 which I know I overpaid since it said £8 in pencil on the inside. )
Gloinson wrote:
Dagoth wrote:
Predictable Matt wrote:
What do we think about the fact of the seller splitting a 1st/1st set into three separate listings?
Would one normally expect such a set, even without three DJs and not in the best condition, to command a higher total price when sold together?
he listed it as a charity. Don't think he cares all that much? Or realizes how much its worth.
(10% goes to charity I guess)
All three listings were removed. Perhaps seller realized what they had?
I (and a few others apparently according to him) contacted him and let him know.
He had no idea their value.
He said he is going to list them with a real aunctioneer because he wants to raise as much as he can for charity.
billhinge wrote:
lol, even a 1978 4th/1 with rubbed out writing is on sale at £225 (I bought the £40 which I know I overpaid since it said £8 in pencil on the inside. )
Gosh now I'm starting to think that the £225 I paid a few months ago for a 1st/4th in library binding (and no endpapers) wasn't too bad...
(TBH I was chuffed to bits to get it)
I bought a 1987 50th Anniversary edition with the short stripe for £26 and a couple of people bid against me, started at £4 (I saw it first )
Thanks, just what I was looking for, got 3 of these in varying degrees of grey to blue bought for the dustcover.
I'll put it on my 'Several copies have been seen with the first part of each letter on the left hand side of page 234 cropped. One of these copies was a review copy, so this variant may have priority of issue' copy.
Bought it now
I'll put it on my 'Several copies have been seen with the first part of each letter on the left hand side of page 234 cropped. One of these copies was a review copy, so this variant may have priority of issue' copy.
Bought it now